• Free Speech & Social Media
      • Privacy & Surveillance
      • Transparency & Democracy
    • Litigation
    • Research
    • Policy
      • Events
      • Reading Rooms
      • Blog
      • Video
      • Podcasts
      • The Knight Institute
      • Board
      • Staff
      • Visiting Scholars
      • Work With Us
      • Support Us
      • Contact
      • Press Room

Reading Room Document

Title 2, U.S. Code, Section 130(b) [opinion re: jury duty requirements for legislative staff]

In this memo, the OLC considered two issues: 1) whether the Department of Justice could respond to a formal request from a financial clerk of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate on the jury duty requirements for one of his employees under 2 U.S.C. § 130(b) and 2) whether a member of Congress may refuse to permit their employees to serve as jurors under 2 U.S.C. § 130(b). In response to the first issue, the OLC concluded that it was authorized to give advice only to executive, not legislative, officials per 28 U.S.C. §§ 511-12. As for the second issue, the OLC reasoned that § 130(b) did not provide for an exemption or exception from jury service for any employee of Congress. Additionally, the OLC raised circumstances where a legislative employee could be exempted from jury service––if the person seeking exemption was a “public officer” or someone “directly appointed by a person elected to public office.” Here, the OLC concluded that the position of a financial clerk in the Office of the Secretary of the Senate would likely not fall under this exemption, since the clerk probably would not be a public officer.

March 15, 1974

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

Issues

Free Speech & Social Media

Free Speech & Social Media

Featured

Knight Institute Says Visa Revocations Over Charlie Kirk Criticism Are Unconstitutional

     

Privacy & Surveillance

Privacy & Surveillance

Featured

Appeals Court Revives Journalists’ Case Against Spyware Manufacturer NSO Group

Spyware manufacturers should be held accountable in U.S. courts for actions violating U.S. law, Knight Institute says

Transparency & Democracy

Transparency & Democracy

Featured

Knight Institute Seeks Immediate Release of Trump Administration Agreements with Major Law Firms

 Says records are key to public’s understanding of administration’s vindictive campaign against political opponents

Events

The Science of Chilling Effects

Online

The Science of Chilling Effects

Learn More

Sign up for news about First Amendment events, research, and litigation

  • Issues

    • Free Speech & Social Media
    • Privacy & Surveillance
    • Transparency & Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Public Education

    • Events
    • Reading Rooms
    • Blog
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Knight First Amendment Institute. Design by Point Five. Development by Tierra Innovation. Icons by Leandro Castelao.

2020 Webby Award Winner for Law Website