• Free Speech & Social Media
      • Privacy & Surveillance
      • Transparency & Democracy
    • Litigation
    • Research
    • Policy
      • Events
      • Reading Rooms
      • Blog
      • Video
      • Podcasts
      • The Knight Institute
      • Board
      • Staff
      • Visiting Scholars
      • Work With Us
      • Support Us
      • Contact
      • Press Room

Reading Room Document

OPM Authority to Regulate Reductions-in-Force in the Career Senior Executive Service

The document responds to questions regarding proposed Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations governing reductions-in-force (RIF's) for career appointees to the Senior Executive Service (SES). The conclusions reached in the document are: OPM is authorized to issue a rule governing RIF's of career SES appointees, and OPM is legally required to guarantee SES "fall-back rights" in a RIF only to those career SES employees serving their probationary year. The document also presents a legal analysis of OPM's authority and policy analysis of the fall-back rights issue, recommending a rewrite of the legal analysis before publication. The document raises questions about OPM's authority to regulate SES RIF's and the requirement to guarantee placement for removed SES appointees in non-SES civil service positions. The questions presented for review include whether OPM is authorized to regulate RIF's of career SES appointees and whether OPM is required to guarantee placement in the competitive or excepted civil service to removed SES appointees. The document also provides a brief review of federal personnel law and key terms to clarify the analysis that follows. It discusses the authority of OPM to regulate a wide range of personnel practices affecting all components of the civil service and the implications of the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) on SES appointments and removals. Additionally, the document addresses the legal analysis of OPM's authority to regulate SES RIF's and the analysis of fall-back rights for career SES appointees. It concludes with recommendations for rewriting the legal analysis and clarifying the policy position on fall-back rights.

June 26, 1981

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

Issues

Free Speech & Social Media

Free Speech & Social Media

Featured

Knight Institute Says Visa Revocations Over Charlie Kirk Criticism Are Unconstitutional

     

Privacy & Surveillance

Privacy & Surveillance

Featured

Appeals Court Revives Journalists’ Case Against Spyware Manufacturer NSO Group

Spyware manufacturers should be held accountable in U.S. courts for actions violating U.S. law, Knight Institute says

Transparency & Democracy

Transparency & Democracy

Featured

Knight Institute Seeks Immediate Release of Trump Administration Agreements with Major Law Firms

 Says records are key to public’s understanding of administration’s vindictive campaign against political opponents

Events

The Science of Chilling Effects

Online

The Science of Chilling Effects

Learn More

Sign up for news about First Amendment events, research, and litigation

  • Issues

    • Free Speech & Social Media
    • Privacy & Surveillance
    • Transparency & Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Public Education

    • Events
    • Reading Rooms
    • Blog
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Knight First Amendment Institute. Design by Point Five. Development by Tierra Innovation. Icons by Leandro Castelao.

2020 Webby Award Winner for Law Website