• Free Speech & Social Media
      • Privacy & Surveillance
      • Transparency & Democracy
    • Litigation
    • Research
    • Policy
      • Events
      • Reading Rooms
      • Blog
      • Video
      • Podcasts
      • The Knight Institute
      • Board
      • Staff
      • Visiting Scholars
      • Work With Us
      • Support Us
      • Contact
      • Press Room

Reading Room Document

Response to the following motion adopted at the February 1974 meeting of the Interagency Classification Review Committee.

This memo responded to a motion adopted by the Interagency Classification Review Committee, which sought the OLC’s advice on the delegation of classification authority. The question arose because an assistant to the president asked OMB to prepare an executive order that would confer “secret” classification authority on three executive officials. The OLC concluded that the authority could be conferred by the president in writing by formal presidential under E.O. 111652 § 2(A), and not by executive order under § 2(D) or by the National Security Council under § 2(B)(2). Section 2(A), which permitted authorization of an official, or acting official, by simple presidential designation in writing, applied to the act at issue. Section 2(D) did not apply because the authorization did not concern a department or its head. While designation under § 2(B)(2) might be possible, since the National Security Council had “Top Secret” authority and could confer “Secret” authority on its “subordinates,” it was not clear whether the officials were “subordinates” of the council––and the lack of clarity could present issues of proof in the context of criminal proceedings involving the improper disclosure of classified information.

March 28, 1974

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

Issues

Free Speech & Social Media

Free Speech & Social Media

Featured

Knight Institute Says Visa Revocations Over Charlie Kirk Criticism Are Unconstitutional

     

Privacy & Surveillance

Privacy & Surveillance

Featured

Appeals Court Revives Journalists’ Case Against Spyware Manufacturer NSO Group

Spyware manufacturers should be held accountable in U.S. courts for actions violating U.S. law, Knight Institute says

Transparency & Democracy

Transparency & Democracy

Featured

Knight Institute Seeks Immediate Release of Trump Administration Agreements with Major Law Firms

 Says records are key to public’s understanding of administration’s vindictive campaign against political opponents

Events

The Science of Chilling Effects

Online

The Science of Chilling Effects

Learn More

Sign up for news about First Amendment events, research, and litigation

  • Issues

    • Free Speech & Social Media
    • Privacy & Surveillance
    • Transparency & Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Research
  • Policy
  • Public Education

    • Events
    • Reading Rooms
    • Blog
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • About
  • Press Room
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Knight First Amendment Institute. Design by Point Five. Development by Tierra Innovation. Icons by Leandro Castelao.

2020 Webby Award Winner for Law Website